@article {1243,
	title = {Adaptation, the genre},
	journal = {Adaptation},
	volume = {1},
	year = {2008},
	pages = {106-120},
	abstract = {<p>Instead of considering film and television adaptations in the context of the source texts they are adapting, this essay proposes another context for their reception and analysis: the genre of adaptation itself. Focusing on the Hollywood traditions of masculine adventure and feminine romance associated respectively with adaptations of Alexandre Dumas p\&egrave;re and fils, it identifies four genre markers common to both traditions that make it more likely a given adaptation will be perceived as an adaptation even by an audience that does not know its source, and one anti-marker associated with adaptations in the tradition of the younger Dumas but not the elder. The essay concludes by proposing adaptation as a model for all Hollywood genres.</p>
},
	keywords = {adaptation, adventure, Dumas, film, genre, romance},
	author = {Leitch, Thomas}
}
@article {1287,
	title = {Adaptation, the Genre.},
	journal = {Adaptation},
	volume = {1},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008},
	pages = {106-120},
	type = {Journal Article},
	chapter = {106},
	author = {Leitch, Thomas}
}
@article {1290,
	title = {Twice-Told Tales: The Rhetoric of the Remake},
	journal = {Literature Film Quarterly},
	volume = {18},
	year = {1990},
	month = {1990},
	pages = {138-149},
	chapter = {138},
	author = {Leitch, Thomas}
}
